Pass it on: Tinyurl.com/IsraelAttacksGaza
Wednesday, December 31, 2008
Israel Violating International Law & the Media Cover-up
See Parts 1 & 2 : Israel Violating International Law & the Media Cover-up
Pass it on: Tinyurl.com/IsraelAttacksGaza
Pass it on: Tinyurl.com/IsraelAttacksGaza
Israel Attacks Gaza Again
"It was Israel that, on Nov. 4, initiated an armed attack that violated the truce and killed six Palestinians" - See important blog post: Israel Attacks Gaza Again
Pass it on:
Tinyurl.com/IsraelAttacks
Pass it on:
Tinyurl.com/IsraelAttacks
Saturday, December 13, 2008
Thursday, December 11, 2008
The cruelty and unlawfulness of the Gaza blockade imposed by Israel
UNITED NATIONS
Press Release
Gaza: Silence is not an option
9 December 2008
The Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights on Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, Richard Falk, issued the following statement:
GENEVA -- In recent days the desperate plight of the civilian population of Gaza has been acknowledged by such respected international figures as the Secretary General of the United Nations, the President of the General Assembly, and the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights.
Last week, Karen AbyZayd, who heads the UN relief effort in Gaza, offered first-hand confirmation of the desperate urgency and unacceptable conditions facing the civilian population of Gaza. Although many leaders have commented on the cruelty and unlawfulness of the Gaza blockade imposed by Israel, such a flurry of denunciations by normally cautious UN officials has not occurred on a global level since the heyday of South African apartheid.
And still Israel maintains its Gaza siege in its full fury, allowing only barely enough food and fuel to enter to stave off mass famine and disease. Such a policy of collective punishment, initiated by Israel to punish Gazans for political developments within the Gaza strip, constitutes a continuing flagrant and massive violation of international humanitarian law as laid down in Article 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention.
It is long past the time when talk suffices. As AbuZayd has written, "the chasm between word and deed" with respect to upholding human rights in occupied Palestine creates a situation where "radicalism and extremism easily take root." The UN is obligated to respond under these conditions. Some governments of the world are complicit by continuing their support politically and economically for Israel's punitive approach.
Protective action must be taken immediately to offset the persisting and wide-ranging violations of the fundamental human right to life, and in view of the emergency situation that is producing a humanitarian catastrophe that is unfolding day by day. However difficult politically, it is time to act. At the very least, an urgent effort should be made at the United Nations to implement the agreed norm of a 'responsibility to protect' a civilian population being collectively punished by policies that amount to a Crime Against Humanity.
In a similar vein, it would seem mandatory for the International Criminal Court to investigate the situation, and determine whether the Israeli civilian leaders and military commanders responsible for the Gaza siege should be indicted and prosecuted for violations of international criminal law. As AbuZayd has declared, "This is a humanitarian crisis deliberately imposed by political actors."
It should be noted that the situation worsened in recent days due to the breakdown of a truce between Hamas and Israel that had been observed for several months by both sides. The truce was maintained by Hamas despite the failure of Israel to fulfill its obligation under the agreement to improve the living conditions of the people of Gaza.
The recent upsurge of violence occurred after an Israeli incursion that killed several alleged Palestinian militants within Gaza. It is a criminal violation of international law for elements of Hamas or anyone else to fire rockets at Israeli towns regardless of provocation, but such Palestinian behavior does not legalize Israel's imposition of a collective punishment of a life- and health-threatening character on the people of Gaza, and should not distract the UN or international society from discharging their fundamental moral and legal duty to render protection to the Palestinian people.
ENDS
For further information on the Occupied Palestinian Territories, and work and mandate of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights on Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, visit the following website: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/countries/MENARegion/Pages/PSIndex.aspx
Press Release
Gaza: Silence is not an option
9 December 2008
The Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights on Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, Richard Falk, issued the following statement:
GENEVA -- In recent days the desperate plight of the civilian population of Gaza has been acknowledged by such respected international figures as the Secretary General of the United Nations, the President of the General Assembly, and the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights.
Last week, Karen AbyZayd, who heads the UN relief effort in Gaza, offered first-hand confirmation of the desperate urgency and unacceptable conditions facing the civilian population of Gaza. Although many leaders have commented on the cruelty and unlawfulness of the Gaza blockade imposed by Israel, such a flurry of denunciations by normally cautious UN officials has not occurred on a global level since the heyday of South African apartheid.
And still Israel maintains its Gaza siege in its full fury, allowing only barely enough food and fuel to enter to stave off mass famine and disease. Such a policy of collective punishment, initiated by Israel to punish Gazans for political developments within the Gaza strip, constitutes a continuing flagrant and massive violation of international humanitarian law as laid down in Article 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention.
It is long past the time when talk suffices. As AbuZayd has written, "the chasm between word and deed" with respect to upholding human rights in occupied Palestine creates a situation where "radicalism and extremism easily take root." The UN is obligated to respond under these conditions. Some governments of the world are complicit by continuing their support politically and economically for Israel's punitive approach.
Protective action must be taken immediately to offset the persisting and wide-ranging violations of the fundamental human right to life, and in view of the emergency situation that is producing a humanitarian catastrophe that is unfolding day by day. However difficult politically, it is time to act. At the very least, an urgent effort should be made at the United Nations to implement the agreed norm of a 'responsibility to protect' a civilian population being collectively punished by policies that amount to a Crime Against Humanity.
In a similar vein, it would seem mandatory for the International Criminal Court to investigate the situation, and determine whether the Israeli civilian leaders and military commanders responsible for the Gaza siege should be indicted and prosecuted for violations of international criminal law. As AbuZayd has declared, "This is a humanitarian crisis deliberately imposed by political actors."
It should be noted that the situation worsened in recent days due to the breakdown of a truce between Hamas and Israel that had been observed for several months by both sides. The truce was maintained by Hamas despite the failure of Israel to fulfill its obligation under the agreement to improve the living conditions of the people of Gaza.
The recent upsurge of violence occurred after an Israeli incursion that killed several alleged Palestinian militants within Gaza. It is a criminal violation of international law for elements of Hamas or anyone else to fire rockets at Israeli towns regardless of provocation, but such Palestinian behavior does not legalize Israel's imposition of a collective punishment of a life- and health-threatening character on the people of Gaza, and should not distract the UN or international society from discharging their fundamental moral and legal duty to render protection to the Palestinian people.
ENDS
For further information on the Occupied Palestinian Territories, and work and mandate of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights on Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, visit the following website: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/countries/MENARegion/Pages/PSIndex.aspx
Tuesday, December 9, 2008
Friday, December 5, 2008
David Pollock & The Washington Institute for Near East Policy
David Pollock & The Washington Institute for Near East Policy
SEE VIDEO: Pollock and the Israel LobbyWashington Institute for Near East Policy: An AIPAC "Image Problem"
"Martin Indyk, an Australian and naturalized US citizen, is the former deputy director of research at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Indyk helped establish the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) in 1984 with the support of AIPAC board member and activist Barbi Weinberg."
Why AIPAC took over Brookings
Saturday, November 15, 2008
Saturday, November 1, 2008
Thursday, October 30, 2008
Thursday, October 23, 2008
Colin Powell is a Hypocrite
Colin Powell is a Hypocrite
see video
"If you look at what Colin Powell said in Washington Post editor Karen DeYoung's biographical book about him. She had said that Colin Powell had conveyed to her that the "JINSA crowd," the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, which Dick Cheney is associated with, is in control of the Pentagon and pushed us into Iraq and now is doing similar to get us to attack Iran." * see Scott McClellan Questioned about Neocon Push for Iraq War
See what Powell did at the UN: Tinyurl.com/5nedmw
Republican Senator Ted Stevens from Alaska is on trial for making false statements by failing to disclose "things of value" he received from Veco Corp. A federal grand jury indicted him on 7 felony counts of making false statements by filing false financial forms.
Why does Sen. Stevens and Sen. Obama think Colin Powell helps them given the fact that Powell misrepresented key testimony in order to sell an illegal war?
"JINSA is the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, a hawkish think tank that supported the Iraq war. Thomas Neumann, Jinsa’s executive director, said he was not offended by Powell’s reference, although he was surprised that the former secretary of state would single out a Jewish group when naming those who supported the war. 'I am not accusing Powell of anything, but these are words that the antisemites will use in the future,' Neumann said." - The Jewish Daily Forward, Groups Fear Public Backlash Over Iran
"The Republican is charged with seven felony counts of making false statements by filing false financial forms related to more than $250,000 in renovations to his family's Alaska home. The alleged offenses occurred roughly between 2000 and 2007." http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/22/stevens.trial/
"The federal government charges that the 84-year-old Republican accepted and concealed more than $250,000 worth of free home renovations and gifts from Bill Allen, the head of Veco Corp., a now-defunct oil-services company, and other friends. Prosecutors argued that Sen. Stevens willfully chose not to report the alleged gifts on Senate financial disclosure forms."
http://online.wsj.com/article/
see video
"If you look at what Colin Powell said in Washington Post editor Karen DeYoung's biographical book about him. She had said that Colin Powell had conveyed to her that the "JINSA crowd," the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, which Dick Cheney is associated with, is in control of the Pentagon and pushed us into Iraq and now is doing similar to get us to attack Iran." * see Scott McClellan Questioned about Neocon Push for Iraq War
See what Powell did at the UN: Tinyurl.com/5nedmw
Republican Senator Ted Stevens from Alaska is on trial for making false statements by failing to disclose "things of value" he received from Veco Corp. A federal grand jury indicted him on 7 felony counts of making false statements by filing false financial forms.
Why does Sen. Stevens and Sen. Obama think Colin Powell helps them given the fact that Powell misrepresented key testimony in order to sell an illegal war?
"JINSA is the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, a hawkish think tank that supported the Iraq war. Thomas Neumann, Jinsa’s executive director, said he was not offended by Powell’s reference, although he was surprised that the former secretary of state would single out a Jewish group when naming those who supported the war. 'I am not accusing Powell of anything, but these are words that the antisemites will use in the future,' Neumann said." - The Jewish Daily Forward, Groups Fear Public Backlash Over Iran"The Republican is charged with seven felony counts of making false statements by filing false financial forms related to more than $250,000 in renovations to his family's Alaska home. The alleged offenses occurred roughly between 2000 and 2007." http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/22/stevens.trial/
"The federal government charges that the 84-year-old Republican accepted and concealed more than $250,000 worth of free home renovations and gifts from Bill Allen, the head of Veco Corp., a now-defunct oil-services company, and other friends. Prosecutors argued that Sen. Stevens willfully chose not to report the alleged gifts on Senate financial disclosure forms."
http://online.wsj.com/article/
Wednesday, October 8, 2008
Neoconservatives have taken over the Executive Branch
Neoconservatives have taken over the Executive Branch
See Video:
Stephen J. Sniegoski is the author of the The Transparent Cabal
Tinyurl.com/TCabal
See Video:
Stephen J. Sniegoski is the author of the The Transparent Cabal
Tinyurl.com/TCabal
Tuesday, October 7, 2008
Friday, October 3, 2008
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
British MP George Galloway Cuts off Caller for Telling the Truth about Jewish NeoCons
British MP George Galloway Cuts off Caller for Telling the Truth about Jewish NeoCons
See Video:
What Galloway did to me on his program was just completely uncalled for because he called me a racist for telling the truth about the Jewish nature of Neoconservatism. He had no right to cut me off and call me a racist when what I said was accurate about the neoconservative movement being a Jewish movement. Send link to others: Tinyurl.com/GallowayCutsOff
Stephen J. Sniegoski is the author of the The Transparent Cabal
"Miliband is merely following in the tradition of former British foreign secretaries who have supported Israel, turned a blind eye to its brutality and surrounded themselves with Arab tyrants who now do not even speak against Israel, let alone dream of reversing its illegal occupation. After all, as a former British foreign secretary, Arthur Balfour, designed the scheme to establish the Israeli entity on the land of Palestine, who better then the current British foreign secretary to defend its brutality?" - Miliband defends Israeli brutality
"Most neocons share unwavering support for Israel ... The original neocons were a small group of mostly Jewish liberal intellectuals" - Neocon 101, Some basic questions answered - The Christian Science Monitor
"The fact that a great many Jewish neoconservatives--people like Joe Lieberman and the crowd over at Commentary--plumped for this war, and now for an even more foolish assault on Iran, raised the question of divided loyalties: using U.S. military power, U.S. lives and money, to make the world safe for Israel. And then there is the question--made manifest by the no-bid contracts offered U.S. oil companies by the Iraqis--of two oil executives, Bush and Cheney, securing a new source of business for their Texas buddies." - Joe Klein June 24, 2008
"There is a small group of Jewish neoconservatives who unsuccessfully tried to get Benjamin Netanyahu to attack Saddam Hussein in the 1990s, and then successfully helped provide the intellectual rationale for George Bush to do it in 2003. Their motivations involve a confused conflation of what they think are Israel's best interests with those of the United States. They are now leading the charge for war with Iran"
"I am not willing to grant these ideologues the anonymity they seek ... I believe there are a small group of Jewish neoconservatives who are pushing for war with Iran because they believe it is in America's long-term interests and because they believe Israel's existence is at stake. They are wrong and recent history tells us they are dangerous. They are also bullies and I'm not going to be intimidated by them." -When Extremists Attack by Joe Klein
Joe Klein is TIME's political columnist and author of six books, most recently Politics Lost.
See Video:
What Galloway did to me on his program was just completely uncalled for because he called me a racist for telling the truth about the Jewish nature of Neoconservatism. He had no right to cut me off and call me a racist when what I said was accurate about the neoconservative movement being a Jewish movement. Send link to others: Tinyurl.com/GallowayCutsOffStephen J. Sniegoski is the author of the The Transparent Cabal"Miliband is merely following in the tradition of former British foreign secretaries who have supported Israel, turned a blind eye to its brutality and surrounded themselves with Arab tyrants who now do not even speak against Israel, let alone dream of reversing its illegal occupation. After all, as a former British foreign secretary, Arthur Balfour, designed the scheme to establish the Israeli entity on the land of Palestine, who better then the current British foreign secretary to defend its brutality?" - Miliband defends Israeli brutality
"Most neocons share unwavering support for Israel ... The original neocons were a small group of mostly Jewish liberal intellectuals" - Neocon 101, Some basic questions answered - The Christian Science Monitor
"The fact that a great many Jewish neoconservatives--people like Joe Lieberman and the crowd over at Commentary--plumped for this war, and now for an even more foolish assault on Iran, raised the question of divided loyalties: using U.S. military power, U.S. lives and money, to make the world safe for Israel. And then there is the question--made manifest by the no-bid contracts offered U.S. oil companies by the Iraqis--of two oil executives, Bush and Cheney, securing a new source of business for their Texas buddies." - Joe Klein June 24, 2008
"There is a small group of Jewish neoconservatives who unsuccessfully tried to get Benjamin Netanyahu to attack Saddam Hussein in the 1990s, and then successfully helped provide the intellectual rationale for George Bush to do it in 2003. Their motivations involve a confused conflation of what they think are Israel's best interests with those of the United States. They are now leading the charge for war with Iran"
"I am not willing to grant these ideologues the anonymity they seek ... I believe there are a small group of Jewish neoconservatives who are pushing for war with Iran because they believe it is in America's long-term interests and because they believe Israel's existence is at stake. They are wrong and recent history tells us they are dangerous. They are also bullies and I'm not going to be intimidated by them." -When Extremists Attack by Joe Klein
Joe Klein is TIME's political columnist and author of six books, most recently Politics Lost.
White man's burden "The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history. Two of them, journalists William Kristol and Charles Krauthammer, say it's possible. But another journalist, Thomas Friedman (not part of the group), is skeptical"
Tuesday, September 16, 2008
Why Employ Seth Jones?
Ask RAND why they employ Seth Jones who denies that US support of Israel was a primary reason for the 9/11 attacks.
Is this the mission of RAND Corporation? Employ devious Zionists who lie to the public about why we were attacked on 9/11 in order to suppress the main motive for the attacks? US support of Israel was a primary motive for the 9/11 attacks, why is the RAND Corporation paying a man who lies to the public about 9/11? See this video and pass it on: Tinyurl.com/FireSeth
Contact the RAND Corporation here and demand that they fire this liar
Seth, look at this, these are examples from just the 1996 fatwa, there are many more:
"Today we work from the same mountains to lift the iniquity that had been imposed on the Ummah by the Zionist-Crusader alliance, particularly after they have occupied the blessed land around Jerusalem [Seth, that refers to ISRAEL], route of the journey of the Prophet (ALLAH'S BLESSING AND SALUTATIONS ON HIM) and the land of the two Holy Places. " - Osama bin Laden's 1996 fatwa or declaration of war
"It is out of date and no longer acceptable to claim that the presence of the crusaders is necessity and only a temporary measures to protect the land of the two Holy Places. Especially when the civil and the military infrastructures of Iraq were savagely destroyed showing the depth of the Zionist-Crusaders hatred to the Muslims and their children, and the rejection of the idea of replacing the crusaders forces by an Islamic force composed of the sons of the country and other Muslim people." - Osama bin Laden's 1996 fatwa or declaration of war
"My Muslim Brothers (particularly those of the Arab Peninsula): The money you pay to buy American goods will be transformed into bullets and used against our brothers in Palestine and tomorrow (future) against our sons in the land of the two Holy places. By buying these goods we are strengthening their economy while our dispossession and poverty increases.
Muslims Brothers of land of the two Holy Places:
It is incredible that our country is the world largest buyer of arms from the USA and the area biggest commercial partners of the Americans who are assisting their Zionist brothers in occupying Palestine and in evicting and killing the Muslims there, by providing arms, men and financial supports.
To deny these occupiers from the enormous revenues of their trading with our country is a very important help for our Jihad against them. To express our anger and hate to them is a very important moral gesture. By doing so we would have taken part in (the process of ) cleansing our sanctities from the crusaders and the Zionists and forcing them, by the Permission of Allah, to leave disappointed and defeated. " - Osama bin Laden's 1996 fatwa or declaration of war
"It should not be hidden from you that the people of Islam had suffered from aggression, iniquity and injustice imposed on them by the Zionist-Crusaders alliance and their collaborators; to the extent that the Muslims blood became the cheapest and their wealth as loot in the hands of the enemies. Their blood was spilled in Palestine and Iraq. The horrifying pictures of the massacre of Qana, in Lebanon are still fresh in our memory." - Osama bin Laden's 1996 fatwa or declaration of war
"The youths hold you responsible for all of the killings and evictions of the Muslims and the violation of the sanctities, carried out by your Zionist brothers in Lebanon; you openly supplied them with arms and finance. More than 600,000 Iraqi children have died due to lack of food and medicine and as a result of the unjustifiable aggression (sanction) imposed on Iraq and its nation. The children of Iraq are our children. You, the USA, together with the Saudi regime are responsible for the shedding of the blood of these innocent children." - Osama bin Laden's 1996 fatwa or declaration of war
"My Muslim Brothers of The World:
Your brothers in Palestine and in the land of the two Holy Places are calling upon your help and asking you to take part in fighting against the enemy --your enemy and their enemy-- the Americans and the Israelis. they are asking you to do whatever you can, with one own means and ability, to expel the enemy, humiliated and defeated, out of the sanctities of Islam" - Osama bin Laden's 1996 fatwa or declaration of war
"The people of Islam awakened and realised that they are the main target for the aggression of the Zionist-Crusaders alliance." - Osama bin Laden's 1996 fatwa or declaration of war
Seth, you aren't telling the truth about what our intelligence agencies say. See video:
9/11 and Wrong Policy
Seth, it is outrageous for people to deny that bin Laden has been angry about U.S. support of Israel for a long time, for decades.
Is this the mission of RAND Corporation? Employ devious Zionists who lie to the public about why we were attacked on 9/11 in order to suppress the main motive for the attacks? US support of Israel was a primary motive for the 9/11 attacks, why is the RAND Corporation paying a man who lies to the public about 9/11? See this video and pass it on: Tinyurl.com/FireSeth
Contact the RAND Corporation here and demand that they fire this liar
Seth, look at this, these are examples from just the 1996 fatwa, there are many more:
"Today we work from the same mountains to lift the iniquity that had been imposed on the Ummah by the Zionist-Crusader alliance, particularly after they have occupied the blessed land around Jerusalem [Seth, that refers to ISRAEL], route of the journey of the Prophet (ALLAH'S BLESSING AND SALUTATIONS ON HIM) and the land of the two Holy Places. " - Osama bin Laden's 1996 fatwa or declaration of war
"It is out of date and no longer acceptable to claim that the presence of the crusaders is necessity and only a temporary measures to protect the land of the two Holy Places. Especially when the civil and the military infrastructures of Iraq were savagely destroyed showing the depth of the Zionist-Crusaders hatred to the Muslims and their children, and the rejection of the idea of replacing the crusaders forces by an Islamic force composed of the sons of the country and other Muslim people." - Osama bin Laden's 1996 fatwa or declaration of war
"My Muslim Brothers (particularly those of the Arab Peninsula): The money you pay to buy American goods will be transformed into bullets and used against our brothers in Palestine and tomorrow (future) against our sons in the land of the two Holy places. By buying these goods we are strengthening their economy while our dispossession and poverty increases.
Muslims Brothers of land of the two Holy Places:
It is incredible that our country is the world largest buyer of arms from the USA and the area biggest commercial partners of the Americans who are assisting their Zionist brothers in occupying Palestine and in evicting and killing the Muslims there, by providing arms, men and financial supports.
To deny these occupiers from the enormous revenues of their trading with our country is a very important help for our Jihad against them. To express our anger and hate to them is a very important moral gesture. By doing so we would have taken part in (the process of ) cleansing our sanctities from the crusaders and the Zionists and forcing them, by the Permission of Allah, to leave disappointed and defeated. " - Osama bin Laden's 1996 fatwa or declaration of war
"It should not be hidden from you that the people of Islam had suffered from aggression, iniquity and injustice imposed on them by the Zionist-Crusaders alliance and their collaborators; to the extent that the Muslims blood became the cheapest and their wealth as loot in the hands of the enemies. Their blood was spilled in Palestine and Iraq. The horrifying pictures of the massacre of Qana, in Lebanon are still fresh in our memory." - Osama bin Laden's 1996 fatwa or declaration of war
"The youths hold you responsible for all of the killings and evictions of the Muslims and the violation of the sanctities, carried out by your Zionist brothers in Lebanon; you openly supplied them with arms and finance. More than 600,000 Iraqi children have died due to lack of food and medicine and as a result of the unjustifiable aggression (sanction) imposed on Iraq and its nation. The children of Iraq are our children. You, the USA, together with the Saudi regime are responsible for the shedding of the blood of these innocent children." - Osama bin Laden's 1996 fatwa or declaration of war
"My Muslim Brothers of The World:
Your brothers in Palestine and in the land of the two Holy Places are calling upon your help and asking you to take part in fighting against the enemy --your enemy and their enemy-- the Americans and the Israelis. they are asking you to do whatever you can, with one own means and ability, to expel the enemy, humiliated and defeated, out of the sanctities of Islam" - Osama bin Laden's 1996 fatwa or declaration of war
"The people of Islam awakened and realised that they are the main target for the aggression of the Zionist-Crusaders alliance." - Osama bin Laden's 1996 fatwa or declaration of war
Seth, you aren't telling the truth about what our intelligence agencies say. See video:
9/11 and Wrong Policy
Seth, it is outrageous for people to deny that bin Laden has been angry about U.S. support of Israel for a long time, for decades.
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
9/11 and Wrong Policy, what the 9/11 Commission Report did to us
Please discuss the fact that the 9/11 Commission did not do its job. This video shows exactly what I am talking about: 9/11 and Wrong Policy, what the 9/11 Commission Report did to us.
Pass this URL on to others:
http://tinyurl.com/911WrongPolicy
SEE VIDEO
In their book, "Without Precedent" top 9/11 Commission admit to the game the played. Commissioners REJECTED mentioning the Israeli-Palestinian dispute. And you can see this this video the testimony they excluded from the 9/11 Report.
Pass this URL on to others:
http://tinyurl.com/911WrongPolicy
SEE VIDEO
In their book, "Without Precedent" top 9/11 Commission admit to the game the played. Commissioners REJECTED mentioning the Israeli-Palestinian dispute. And you can see this this video the testimony they excluded from the 9/11 Report.
Thursday, September 4, 2008
Talking about the Israel Lobby with Brig. Gen. James David on the Liberty Hour
Talking about the Israel Lobby with Brig. Gen. James Davidon the Liberty Hour. The Lobby's power blocked President Carter from speaking at the Democratic National Convention
SEE VIDEO: TinyUrl.com/IsraelLobbyPower
"Former president Jimmy Carter’s controversial views on Israel cost him a place on the podium at the Democratic Party convention in late August, senior Democratic operatives acknowledged to the Forward.
Passionate attachment to Israel by James J. David
A Declaration of Independence from Israel by Chris Hedges
THE LIBERTY HOUR
See Video:
US Media FAILS to Inform the Public about Looming ILLEGAL Attack which Risks Starting WORLD WAR THREE.
SEE VIDEO: TinyUrl.com/IsraelLobbyPower
"Former president Jimmy Carter’s controversial views on Israel cost him a place on the podium at the Democratic Party convention in late August, senior Democratic operatives acknowledged to the Forward. Breaking with the tradition of giving speech time to living former presidents, convention organizers honored Carter with only a short video clip highlighting his work with Hurricane Katrina victims and a brief walk across the Pepsi Center stage.
The sidelining of Carter was driven by recognition in the Obama camp and among Democratic leaders that giving the former president a prominent convention spot might alienate Jewish voters." - Jimmy Carter Conspicuously Absent From Podium By Brett Lieberman and Nathan Guttman, The Jewish Daily Forward, NY - Aug 28, 2008
Passionate attachment to Israel by James J. David
A Declaration of Independence from Israel by Chris Hedges
THE LIBERTY HOUR
See Video:
US Media FAILS to Inform the Public about Looming ILLEGAL Attack which Risks Starting WORLD WAR THREE.
Wednesday, September 3, 2008
Tuesday, August 26, 2008
President Bush and Bush Apologist Fred Hiatt
"Fred Hiatt, over at the Washington Post, makes much of the phrase found in many of the conclusions of the report, “were generally substantiated by intelligence community estimates.” What he doesn’t tell you is that the committee only examined five of George Bush’s speeches, not the totality of the administration’s statements" - Bush Lied, and Fred Hiatt Lied Too
"Someone should tell Fred Hiatt that supporting your position by omitting crucial parts that undercut your point is lying. That’s what Hiatt did in this editorial defending the integrity of the Bush administration’s use of prewar intelligence to justify the invasion of Iraq." - Not Only Did Bush Lie, But Fred Hiatt Lied, Too
See Video:
Neocons Pushed Us into War with Iraq and Now with Iran!
See Video:
http://tinyurl.com/5johhg
The "JINSA crowd" is control of the Pentagon. The Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, it pushed us into Iraq and it's doing the same to get us to attack Iran.
See link
"Someone should tell Fred Hiatt that supporting your position by omitting crucial parts that undercut your point is lying. That’s what Hiatt did in this editorial defending the integrity of the Bush administration’s use of prewar intelligence to justify the invasion of Iraq." - Not Only Did Bush Lie, But Fred Hiatt Lied, Too
See Video:
Neocons Pushed Us into War with Iraq and Now with Iran!
See Video:
http://tinyurl.com/5johhg
The "JINSA crowd" is control of the Pentagon. The Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, it pushed us into Iraq and it's doing the same to get us to attack Iran.
See link
Sunday, August 24, 2008
Don't Let the Neocon Agenda Get US into wider Middle East War
See video: Don't Let the Neocon Agenda Get US into wider Middle East War: Talking with Stephen J. Sniegoski, author of the Transparent Cabal
The Transparent Cabal
Why would top neocons deceive us into a war with Iraq? You can read about "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm" which reveals that attacking Iraq was an agenda long before the 9/11 attacks which they dishonestly used as an excuse for the Iraq war.
See Video:
Scott McClellan Questioned about Neocon Push for Iraq War
If you look at what Colin Powell said in Washington Post editor Karen DeYoung's biographical book about him. She had said that Colin Powell had conveyed to her that the "JINSA crowd," the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, which Dick Cheney is associated with, is in control of the Pentagon and pushed us into Iraq and now is doing similar to get us to attack Iran.
They Knew They Were Right: The Rise of the Neocons
by Jacob Heilbrunn
The Neoconservative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and the Shaping of Public Policy by Murray Friedman
Amy Goodman Democracy Now interview with Sonali Kolhatkar
SONALI KOLHATKAR: Well, certainly, what Afghanistan gives to the United States, particularly under the Bush administration, which has not been as interested in oil pipeline routes as it has been in military bases, it gives, of course, as you said, a launching pad, and it enables the United States to encircle Iran.
When I was in Afghanistan a few years ago, we drove past a military base that used to be just a local airport near the border with Iran, and our driver told us, “Oh, yes. Last month, US troops came and took over the space. And if they attack Iran, everyone knows that they’re going to probably do it from here, as one of the places.”
McCain has said that he would like to see the military bases in Afghanistan become permanent. And this is very important, because geopolitically Afghanistan is crucial to the United States. Never before, since—until 2001, has the United States had military bases in the heart of Central Asia, in Russia’s backyard, in China’s backyard, and certainly, of course, in Iran’s backyard. This is going to be something that the US will make use of in the future, unless, of course, the American people stand up and say, “Get out of Afghanistan,” which is what I think we should do.
AMY GOODMAN: Sonali Kolhatkar, thank you very much for joining us, host of Pacific radio KPFK’s morning show called Uprising. She is co-author of Bleeding Afghanistan: Washington, Warlords, and the Propaganda of Silence.
Call in to the The Liberty Hour August 23, 2008
The Transparent Cabal
Why would top neocons deceive us into a war with Iraq? You can read about "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm" which reveals that attacking Iraq was an agenda long before the 9/11 attacks which they dishonestly used as an excuse for the Iraq war.
See Video:
Scott McClellan Questioned about Neocon Push for Iraq War
If you look at what Colin Powell said in Washington Post editor Karen DeYoung's biographical book about him. She had said that Colin Powell had conveyed to her that the "JINSA crowd," the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, which Dick Cheney is associated with, is in control of the Pentagon and pushed us into Iraq and now is doing similar to get us to attack Iran.
They Knew They Were Right: The Rise of the Neocons by Jacob Heilbrunn
The Neoconservative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and the Shaping of Public Policy by Murray Friedman
Amy Goodman Democracy Now interview with Sonali Kolhatkar
SONALI KOLHATKAR: Well, certainly, what Afghanistan gives to the United States, particularly under the Bush administration, which has not been as interested in oil pipeline routes as it has been in military bases, it gives, of course, as you said, a launching pad, and it enables the United States to encircle Iran.
When I was in Afghanistan a few years ago, we drove past a military base that used to be just a local airport near the border with Iran, and our driver told us, “Oh, yes. Last month, US troops came and took over the space. And if they attack Iran, everyone knows that they’re going to probably do it from here, as one of the places.”
McCain has said that he would like to see the military bases in Afghanistan become permanent. And this is very important, because geopolitically Afghanistan is crucial to the United States. Never before, since—until 2001, has the United States had military bases in the heart of Central Asia, in Russia’s backyard, in China’s backyard, and certainly, of course, in Iran’s backyard. This is going to be something that the US will make use of in the future, unless, of course, the American people stand up and say, “Get out of Afghanistan,” which is what I think we should do.
AMY GOODMAN: Sonali Kolhatkar, thank you very much for joining us, host of Pacific radio KPFK’s morning show called Uprising. She is co-author of Bleeding Afghanistan: Washington, Warlords, and the Propaganda of Silence.
Call in to the The Liberty Hour August 23, 2008
Tuesday, August 19, 2008
Neocons put US at Risk of Nuclear War with Russia
Neocons put US at Risk of Nuclear War with Russia
see video
McCain's senior foreign policy aide was a director of the Project for the New American Century. Neoconservative Randy Scheunemann pushed for the illegal Iraq War and was a paid lobbyist for the foreign country GEORGIA. As Scheunemann advised McCain, McCain called Georgia's President Saakashvili on the same day Scheunemann profited from a $200,000 lobbying contract with Georgia.
"The day of the call, a lobbying firm partly owned by the adviser, Randy Scheunemann, signed a $200,000 contract to continue providing strategic advice to the Georgian government in Washington." - While Aide Advised McCain, His Firm Lobbied for Georgia
"The neoconned Bush Regime and the Israeli-occupied American media are heading the innocent world toward nuclear war." - Paul Craig Roberts, Two Morons: Bush and Saakashvili "President Bush, Will You Please Shut Up?"
Did McCain's foreign-policy advisor profit from the Iraq war?
"It is obvious that American foreign policy, with is goal of ringing
Russia with US military bases, is leading directly to nuclear war.
Every American needs to realize this fact. "- Are You Ready For Nuclear War?
"It was obvious to anyone with any sense—, which excludes the entire Bush Regime and almost all of the "foreign policy community"—that the illegal and gratuitous US invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, and Israel's 2006 bombing of Lebanon civilians with US blessing, would result in the overthrow of America's Pakistani puppet." - Paul Craig Roberts
McCain PNAC Neocon adviser got money from Georgia
see videoMcCain's senior foreign policy aide was a director of the Project for the New American Century. Neoconservative Randy Scheunemann pushed for the illegal Iraq War and was a paid lobbyist for the foreign country GEORGIA. As Scheunemann advised McCain, McCain called Georgia's President Saakashvili on the same day Scheunemann profited from a $200,000 lobbying contract with Georgia.
"The day of the call, a lobbying firm partly owned by the adviser, Randy Scheunemann, signed a $200,000 contract to continue providing strategic advice to the Georgian government in Washington." - While Aide Advised McCain, His Firm Lobbied for Georgia
"The neoconned Bush Regime and the Israeli-occupied American media are heading the innocent world toward nuclear war." - Paul Craig Roberts, Two Morons: Bush and Saakashvili "President Bush, Will You Please Shut Up?"
Did McCain's foreign-policy advisor profit from the Iraq war?
"It is obvious that American foreign policy, with is goal of ringing
Russia with US military bases, is leading directly to nuclear war.
Every American needs to realize this fact. "- Are You Ready For Nuclear War?
"It was obvious to anyone with any sense—, which excludes the entire Bush Regime and almost all of the "foreign policy community"—that the illegal and gratuitous US invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, and Israel's 2006 bombing of Lebanon civilians with US blessing, would result in the overthrow of America's Pakistani puppet." - Paul Craig Roberts
McCain PNAC Neocon adviser got money from Georgia
Friday, August 8, 2008
Wednesday, July 23, 2008
Please show your solidarity with Representative Press
Is this happening to any other YouTube partner? Solidarity!
SEE VIDEO and pass it on. Show your solidarity with Representative Press: send it to others: Is this happening to any other YouTube partner? Solidarity!
SEE VIDEO and pass it on. Show your solidarity with Representative Press: send it to others: Is this happening to any other YouTube partner? Solidarity!
Tuesday, July 8, 2008
Neocons Pushed Us into War with Iraq and Now with Iran!
Neocons Pushed Us into War with Iraq and Now with Iran!
See Video:
http://tinyurl.com/5johhg
The "JINSA crowd" is control of the Pentagon. The Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, it pushed us into Iraq and it's doing the same to get us to attack Iran.
Hear prior caller: http://tinyurl.com/6b58zz
More Mainstream Voices Use 'Cabal' to Describe Neocons
The Transparent Cabal
Why would top neocons deceive us into a war with Iraq? You can read about "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm" which reveals that attacking Iraq was an agenda long before the 9/11 attacks which they dishonestly used as an excuse for the Iraq war.
Read James Bamford, in his book A Pretext for War.
See this link for the other books and to read more information about Neocons and the wars in the Middle East: Scott McClellan Questioned about Neocon Push for Iraq War
Read Jefferson Davis's comment to Cowboy
See Video:
http://tinyurl.com/5johhg
The "JINSA crowd" is control of the Pentagon. The Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, it pushed us into Iraq and it's doing the same to get us to attack Iran.
Hear prior caller: http://tinyurl.com/6b58zz
More Mainstream Voices Use 'Cabal' to Describe Neocons
The Transparent Cabal
Why would top neocons deceive us into a war with Iraq? You can read about "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm" which reveals that attacking Iraq was an agenda long before the 9/11 attacks which they dishonestly used as an excuse for the Iraq war.
Read James Bamford, in his book A Pretext for War.
See this link for the other books and to read more information about Neocons and the wars in the Middle East: Scott McClellan Questioned about Neocon Push for Iraq War
Read Jefferson Davis's comment to Cowboy
Monday, July 7, 2008
Jewish Neocons' divided loyalties for Israel? asks Joe Klein
Jewish Neocons' divided loyalties for Israel? asks Joe Klein
See video:
http://tinyurl.com/6b58zz
"The fact that a great many Jewish neoconservatives--people like Joe Lieberman and the crowd over at Commentary--plumped for this war, and now for an even more foolish assault on Iran, raised the question of divided loyalties: using U.S. military power, U.S. lives and money, to make the world safe for Israel. And then there is the question--made manifest by the no-bid contracts offered U.S. oil companies by the Iraqis--of two oil executives, Bush and Cheney, securing a new source of business for their Texas buddies." - Joe Klein June 24, 2008
Turning the Tables on the Israel-Firsters by Michael Scheuer
See video:
http://tinyurl.com/6b58zz
"The fact that a great many Jewish neoconservatives--people like Joe Lieberman and the crowd over at Commentary--plumped for this war, and now for an even more foolish assault on Iran, raised the question of divided loyalties: using U.S. military power, U.S. lives and money, to make the world safe for Israel. And then there is the question--made manifest by the no-bid contracts offered U.S. oil companies by the Iraqis--of two oil executives, Bush and Cheney, securing a new source of business for their Texas buddies." - Joe Klein June 24, 2008
Turning the Tables on the Israel-Firsters by Michael Scheuer
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
Scott McClellan Questioned about Neocon Push for Iraq War
Scott McClellan Questioned about Neocon Push for Iraq War
See Video:
If you look at what Colin Powell said in Washington Post editor Karen DeYoung's biographical book about him. She had said that Colin Powell had conveyed to her that the "JINSA crowd," the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, which Dick Cheney is associated with, is control of the Pentagon and pushed us into Iraq and now is doing similar to get us to attack Iran.
Get the book The Transparent Cabal
"Sniegoski leaves no stone unturned in exposing the Israeli-neocon alliance and its catastrophic consequences in the Middle East." - Jonathan Cook
"JINSA is the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, a hawkish think tank that supported the Iraq war. Thomas Neumann, Jinsa’s executive director, said he was not offended by Powell’s reference, although he was surprised that the former secretary of state would single out a Jewish group when naming those who supported the war. 'I am not accusing Powell of anything, but these are words that the antisemites will use in the future,' Neumann said." - The Jewish Daily Forward, Groups Fear Public Backlash Over Iran
As for a motive why top neocons would want to deceive the American people into a war with Iraq, you can read about "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm" which reveals that attacking Iraq was an agenda long before the 9/11 attacks which they dishonestly try to use as an excuse for the Iraq war. Three of Bush's top national security advisors had worked for "conservative pro-Israel think tanks" creating a plan in violation of international law which the necons do not respect. James Bamford, in his book A Pretext for War, writes, "the blueprint for the new Bush policy had actually been drawn up five years earlier by three of his top national security advisors. Soon to be appointed to senior administration positions, they were Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, and David Wurmser. Ironically the plan was originally intended not for Bush but for another world leader, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. At the time, the three officials were out of government and working for conservative pro-Israel think tanks. Perle and Feith had previously served in high level Pentagon positions during the presidency of Ronald Reagan. In a very unusual move, the former--and future--senior American officials were acting as a sort of American privy council to the new Israeli Prime Minister."
"The Office of Special Plans (OSP) was directed to find evidence that could be used to sell the war against Iraq. It was headed by Adam Shulsky, a neoconservative long associated with Wolfowitz, and its ranks included several recruits from pro-Israel think tanks like Michael Rubin from the American Enterprise Institute, David Schenker from the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, and Michael Makovsky, who had worked for then Prime Minister Shimon Peres after graduating from college." p251, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, by John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt
See Video:
If you look at what Colin Powell said in Washington Post editor Karen DeYoung's biographical book about him. She had said that Colin Powell had conveyed to her that the "JINSA crowd," the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, which Dick Cheney is associated with, is control of the Pentagon and pushed us into Iraq and now is doing similar to get us to attack Iran.
Get the book The Transparent Cabal
"Sniegoski leaves no stone unturned in exposing the Israeli-neocon alliance and its catastrophic consequences in the Middle East." - Jonathan Cook
"JINSA is the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, a hawkish think tank that supported the Iraq war. Thomas Neumann, Jinsa’s executive director, said he was not offended by Powell’s reference, although he was surprised that the former secretary of state would single out a Jewish group when naming those who supported the war. 'I am not accusing Powell of anything, but these are words that the antisemites will use in the future,' Neumann said." - The Jewish Daily Forward, Groups Fear Public Backlash Over Iran
As for a motive why top neocons would want to deceive the American people into a war with Iraq, you can read about "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm" which reveals that attacking Iraq was an agenda long before the 9/11 attacks which they dishonestly try to use as an excuse for the Iraq war. Three of Bush's top national security advisors had worked for "conservative pro-Israel think tanks" creating a plan in violation of international law which the necons do not respect. James Bamford, in his book A Pretext for War, writes, "the blueprint for the new Bush policy had actually been drawn up five years earlier by three of his top national security advisors. Soon to be appointed to senior administration positions, they were Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, and David Wurmser. Ironically the plan was originally intended not for Bush but for another world leader, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. At the time, the three officials were out of government and working for conservative pro-Israel think tanks. Perle and Feith had previously served in high level Pentagon positions during the presidency of Ronald Reagan. In a very unusual move, the former--and future--senior American officials were acting as a sort of American privy council to the new Israeli Prime Minister." "The Office of Special Plans (OSP) was directed to find evidence that could be used to sell the war against Iraq. It was headed by Adam Shulsky, a neoconservative long associated with Wolfowitz, and its ranks included several recruits from pro-Israel think tanks like Michael Rubin from the American Enterprise Institute, David Schenker from the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, and Michael Makovsky, who had worked for then Prime Minister Shimon Peres after graduating from college." p251, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, by John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt
Israeli Threat Spikes Our Oil Prices, We Pay More For This
SEE VIDEO: Israeli Threat Spikes Our Oil Prices, We Pay More For This
Wall Street Journal article excerpt about the Israeli Transport Minister's threat which drove up oil prices: "A senior Israeli official told a prominent Israeli daily Friday that an Israeli attack against Iran was "unavoidable" if Tehran continued to push forward on its controversial nuclear program. Some observers said that single comment, from Transport Minister Shaul Mofaz, may have given oil prices a greater shot of adrenaline than anything else.
"It's one word that did this," said Guy Gleichmann, president of United Strategic Investors Group, a commodities brokerage in Hollywood, Fla. "'Unavoidable.' It's basically saying, 'We're going to attack.'"
Rumors of war with Iran, Mr. Gleichmann said, have often led to a spike of several dollars in the price of oil. The issue had died down for a while, he said, but "this is like Jason coming back from the dead." - Crude Leaps Nearly $11, In Fresh Hit to Economy By NEIL KING JR. June 7, 2008; Page A1 WSJ
Tell Congress: Bush and Israel Have No Right to Attack Iran
Wall Street Journal article excerpt about the Israeli Transport Minister's threat which drove up oil prices: "A senior Israeli official told a prominent Israeli daily Friday that an Israeli attack against Iran was "unavoidable" if Tehran continued to push forward on its controversial nuclear program. Some observers said that single comment, from Transport Minister Shaul Mofaz, may have given oil prices a greater shot of adrenaline than anything else."It's one word that did this," said Guy Gleichmann, president of United Strategic Investors Group, a commodities brokerage in Hollywood, Fla. "'Unavoidable.' It's basically saying, 'We're going to attack.'"
Rumors of war with Iran, Mr. Gleichmann said, have often led to a spike of several dollars in the price of oil. The issue had died down for a while, he said, but "this is like Jason coming back from the dead." - Crude Leaps Nearly $11, In Fresh Hit to Economy By NEIL KING JR. June 7, 2008; Page A1 WSJ
Tell Congress: Bush and Israel Have No Right to Attack Iran
Sunday, June 22, 2008
Monday, June 16, 2008
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
Tell Congress that Bush and Israel Have No Legal Justification to Attack Iran
Tell Congress that Bush and Israel Have No Legal Justification to Attack Iran
SEE VIDEO:
TOLL-FREE NUMBER FOR CONGRESS (just ask for your representatives' offices)
1-800-788-9372
National call-in day to tell your members of Congress to stop an attack on Iran
SEE VIDEO:
TOLL-FREE NUMBER FOR CONGRESS (just ask for your representatives' offices)
1-800-788-9372
National call-in day to tell your members of Congress to stop an attack on Iran
Sunday, June 8, 2008
The Transparent Cabal: The Neoconservative Agenda, War in the Middle East, and the National Interest of Israel
The Transparent Cabal: The Neoconservative Agenda, War in the Middle East, and the National Interest of Israel - See Video Tinyurl.com/3w3e97
Get the book The Transparent Cabal
"Sniegoski leaves no stone unturned in exposing the Israeli-neocon alliance and its catastrophic consequences in the Middle East." - Jonathan Cook
See Video: Tinyurl.com/3w3e97
"JINSA is the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, a hawkish think tank that supported the Iraq war." - The Jewish Daily Forward
A War for Israel? Colin Powell seems to think so.
On no issue is the JINSA/CSP hard line more evident than in its relentless campaign for war -- not just with Iraq, but "total war," as Michael Ledeen, one of the most influential JINSAns in Washington, put it last year. For this crew, "regime change" by any means necessary in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia and the Palestinian Authority is an urgent imperative. Anyone who dissents -- be it Colin Powell's State Department, the CIA or career military officers -- is committing heresy against articles of faith that effectively hold there is no difference between US and Israeli national security interests, and that the only way to assure continued safety and prosperity for both countries is through hegemony in the Middle East -- a hegemony achieved with the traditional cold war recipe of feints, force, clientism and covert action." - Coming Soon: "Total War" On the Middle East
"There are some in military and intelligence circles who have taken to using "axis of evil" in reference to JINSA and CSP, along with venerable repositories of hawkish thinking like the American Enterprise Institute and the Hudson Institute, as well as defense contractors, conservative foundations and public relations entities underwritten by far-right American Zionists (all of which help to underwrite JINSA and CSP). - The Men From JINSA and CSP
"IN THE AFTERMATH of 11 September, the neo-conservative right consolidated a dominant position in the Bush administration. While pushing through their military-strategic agenda, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz have also exerted a decisive influence over US foreign policy, sidelining Colin Powell and the State Department. ... Reflecting JINSA's position that "there is no Israeli occupation", Rumsfeld (at a Pentagon open discussion on 6 August) repeatedly referred to the "so-called Occupied Territories". The Israelis, he commented, were merely "making some settlements in various parts of the so-called occupied area."
"JINSA and CSP are overlapping bodies, funded by a network of conservative foundations and public relations entities underwritten by far-right American Zionist organisations, together with money from defence contractors such as Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, Alliant Tech Systems, Boeing, Ball Aerospace and Technologies, and Hewlett Packard (who supply missile-defence computer systems). (Jason Vest, The Men From JINSA and CSP, The Nation, 2-9 September 2002)" - The fundamentalists in the White House
"JINSA is the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, a hawkish think tank that supported the Iraq war. Thomas Neumann, Jinsa’s executive director, said he was not offended by Powell’s reference, although he was surprised that the former secretary of state would single out a Jewish group when naming those who supported the war. 'I am not accusing Powell of anything, but these are words that the antisemites will use in the future,' Neumann said." - The Jewish Daily Forward, Groups Fear Public Backlash Over Iran
Get the book The Transparent Cabal"Sniegoski leaves no stone unturned in exposing the Israeli-neocon alliance and its catastrophic consequences in the Middle East." - Jonathan Cook
See Video: Tinyurl.com/3w3e97
"JINSA is the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, a hawkish think tank that supported the Iraq war." - The Jewish Daily Forward
A War for Israel? Colin Powell seems to think so.
On no issue is the JINSA/CSP hard line more evident than in its relentless campaign for war -- not just with Iraq, but "total war," as Michael Ledeen, one of the most influential JINSAns in Washington, put it last year. For this crew, "regime change" by any means necessary in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia and the Palestinian Authority is an urgent imperative. Anyone who dissents -- be it Colin Powell's State Department, the CIA or career military officers -- is committing heresy against articles of faith that effectively hold there is no difference between US and Israeli national security interests, and that the only way to assure continued safety and prosperity for both countries is through hegemony in the Middle East -- a hegemony achieved with the traditional cold war recipe of feints, force, clientism and covert action." - Coming Soon: "Total War" On the Middle East
"There are some in military and intelligence circles who have taken to using "axis of evil" in reference to JINSA and CSP, along with venerable repositories of hawkish thinking like the American Enterprise Institute and the Hudson Institute, as well as defense contractors, conservative foundations and public relations entities underwritten by far-right American Zionists (all of which help to underwrite JINSA and CSP). - The Men From JINSA and CSP
"IN THE AFTERMATH of 11 September, the neo-conservative right consolidated a dominant position in the Bush administration. While pushing through their military-strategic agenda, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz have also exerted a decisive influence over US foreign policy, sidelining Colin Powell and the State Department. ... Reflecting JINSA's position that "there is no Israeli occupation", Rumsfeld (at a Pentagon open discussion on 6 August) repeatedly referred to the "so-called Occupied Territories". The Israelis, he commented, were merely "making some settlements in various parts of the so-called occupied area."
"JINSA and CSP are overlapping bodies, funded by a network of conservative foundations and public relations entities underwritten by far-right American Zionist organisations, together with money from defence contractors such as Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, Alliant Tech Systems, Boeing, Ball Aerospace and Technologies, and Hewlett Packard (who supply missile-defence computer systems). (Jason Vest, The Men From JINSA and CSP, The Nation, 2-9 September 2002)" - The fundamentalists in the White House
"JINSA is the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, a hawkish think tank that supported the Iraq war. Thomas Neumann, Jinsa’s executive director, said he was not offended by Powell’s reference, although he was surprised that the former secretary of state would single out a Jewish group when naming those who supported the war. 'I am not accusing Powell of anything, but these are words that the antisemites will use in the future,' Neumann said." - The Jewish Daily Forward, Groups Fear Public Backlash Over Iran