The Neocon Zionist Threat to America

NeoConZionistThreat

Neoconservative deviousness put us at risk and paved the way for 9/11 If this doesn't make you feel uncomfortable or angry, I don't know what will: Neoconservative leaders were insisting that the warnings that Bin Laden was planning to attack should be ignored! You are not going to get these men to say, "Yeah, we sat back, ignored the warnings, so that when an attack happened we could use it as a pretext for our agenda to attack Iraq." BUT their excuses for why the President should ignore the warnings he was being given are so contrived and self-serving that it basically exposes what they were up to. Neoconservative deviousness put us at risk and paved the way for 9/11

NeoConZionistThreat

Israel's Atrocities Against Gaza Get Masked because of Media Malpractice

Tom

Mainstream media is trying to sell another war because they are misrepresenting the latest International Atomic Energy Agency report. What that report actually says is there is no evidence that Iran has diverted any material for a nuclear weapons program. There is no evidence that Iran has diverted any material for a weapons program. And even more important: Much of Iran's uranium stockpile has been converted into a form that would be very difficult to use in a nuclear weapon.

NeoConZionistThreat

On 9/11, Tom Brokaw actually reported why we were attacked!

Tom

Jews You Don't See Demonstrating AGAINST Israel & Brutally Beaten

NeoConZionistThreat

FBI Agent's 9/11 Motive Testimony: Israel References Omitted from 9/11 Report

NeoConZionistThreat

You can Google "James Morris and Russia Today"

NeoConZionistThreat

"Anytime Anybody Calls to Try to Hype a Book, I'm Sorry, No Thanks" SEE VIDEOS HERE

NeoConZionistThreat

Thom Hartmann's Hypocrisy for Israel

Tom

WE CAN STOP THE WARMONGERING!

NeoConZionistThreat

VILE HYPOCRISY EXPOSED by reporter doing his job. "remarkably revealing exchange"!

NeoConZionistThreat

we were attacked We Were Attacked BOTH in 1993 and on 9/11 because of U.S. support for Israel"> BOTH in 1993 and on 9/11 because of U.S. support for Israel

Tom

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB2tZAES2UQ&list=PL79CBEA17959972B4&feature=plpp_play_all
Chomsky on America fighting AGAINST INDEPENDENCE

Tom

‪McCain Confronted on USS Liberty Cover-up & Media Accomplices

NeoConZionistThreat

Congressman Warns of War with Iran

NeoConZionistThreat

Jon Stewart shouldn't do this. Stewart takes an "intellectually and morally disreputable position" by bringing up "Protocols" (as in "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion") which is a known fraud and very often used as an example of anti-Semitism.

Tom

NEW ‪

You Only See "Highlights"‬ See Why Your Subscriptions Are Getting Hidden From You

Tom

So, What IF Iran Did Get a Nuclear Weapon? Then …

Look at this: The premise has been that if Iran gets a nuclear weapon, it will then bomb Israel. That's what the American people have been mislead into thinking because the mainstream media has been misleading them. But look what the response is when the host of this Al Jazeera show ask the Deputy Prime Minister of Israel: what would happen if Iran got a nuclear weapon? Look at the response: "… the consequences of Iran actually having a nuclear weapon, what do you think they would be?" "I would think that in the first place, if, if things develop the way they – uh – may develop because I hear the others saying. Saudi says 'we'll get nuclear weapon if they do.' Eh, other countries may have the same idea – I have some names in mind I don't want to mention right here. We may start a nuclear race in the world which it didn't have for many, many years." Notice he doesn't say, "oh, they'll bomb Israel." And please take note that there is no basis for that scenario. There is no basis for that false premise that the American have been mislead into accepting.

I don't think any strategic analyst in his right mind thinks that, even if Iran had nuclear weapons, that they'd use them in a first strike. The country would be vaporized.

If you haven't seen this video: Israel's Deputy Prime Minister admits Iran DID NOT threaten to wipe Israel out, please do or watch it again and give it a boost, it's really doing well for just the first 2 or 3 days. Millions of people need to see this because once again the American public has been manipulated about the facts of the Middle East and about Israel.

I've heard from people – they're not getting their new subscriptions so please subscribe: Please subscribe to the e-mail list and join the 2 Facebooks (1, 2) and bookmark the Representative Press page and we'll just keep hammering at this platform.

Tom

SEE NEW VIDEOS HERE: Israel's Deputy PM admits Iran DIDN'T threaten to wipe Israel out

Tom

NEW VIDEO: CBS's Mike Wallace Tribute OMITS images of Ahmadinejad! Look what they are hiding. See the Words Ahmadinejad said but Mike Wallace deviously edited out of the 60 Minutes interview. CLICK HERE

Tom

‪Wallace's Deceit ISN'T A JOKE!‬

Tom

CLICK HERE

Tom

NEW VIDEOS: 'Nothing more than Propaganda' NBC/Pentagon Jim Miklaszewsk on Duty

NBC pushes Pentagon line which labels Afghan villagers mention of an IED attack as "propaganda!" NBC claims "no evidence of an IED attack before" the massacre YET the accused shooter's own lawyers has already been talking about it days before this NBC report! Please post this video, don't allow NBC to get away with this. "Reports that Afghan villagers have been offering one theory about what might have motivated his rampage. ... Our Pentagon correspondent Jim Miklaszewski on duty from there tonight. Jim, good evening. Good evening Brian. In another twist to the tragic story, villagers where the shootings took place are now claiming that the 16 civilians were gunned down in retaliation for an IED attack against American forces. That villagers claim that days before the massacre, American combat troops entered that village and threatened to kill every man and their children for that attack on the Americans, but Pentagon and military officials said today there is no evidence of any IED attack around that time and no evidence the Americans threatened retaliation. In fact, officials here at the Pentagon suspect this is nothing more than propaganda." This guy's taking the word of the Pentagon and ignoring statements reported before this report. He's so willing to push the Pentagon line that he's ignoring stories that have already been reported about an IED attack. And that the suspect was upset about that. He ignores what has already been reported, information that was coming from the suspect's own lawyer. And meanwhile Jim accepts the Pentagon story and labels what the Afghan people are saying as "propaganda." Do you think he would ever call what the U.S. says "propaganda?" Do you think he would ever talk about U.S. government statements being criticized as "propaganda?" Do you think ever in a million years this man would say, "by the way, the U.S. government has a pattern of lying.